GUERILLA GEEK BLOGGER IN THE P.I.

Entries categorized as ‘Films’

Random film watchlist: Surrogates, Forbidden Kingdom

November 25, 2009 · Leave a Comment

SURROGATES

Imagine a world where you don’t have to get up early in the morning, shower, get dressed, navigate traffic, get to work on time, dodge annoying bosses and equally annoying colleagues, avoid being given memos or suspensions for low performance evaluations or for doing such inane stuff as forgetting to turn off the light after office hours or taking too many coffee or bathroom breaks. Imagine a world where you don’t have to be subjected to the daily rudeness of people cutting in during queues, rude people in supermarkets, or groceries, or movie theaters, or inside public transportation. Imagine being spared the kind of physical torture that daily living in the modern, post-industrialized world of pollution, acid rain, excessive UV rays and crime generates. Imagine being able to stay at home, having a substitute who looks and talks like you, being able to do that for you, and all you have to do is jack into a network to be able to keep in touch with your substitute you as he/she goes through the daily rituals of modern living. Would be pretty nifty, huh?

This is the premise of the movie “Surrogates”. Based on a comic book and directed by Jonathan Mostow (Terminator 3: Rise of the Machines), this movie takes our growing obsession with virtual reality (SIMS, online RPG games, farmville, facebook, myspace, twitter and so on) to a whole new level: we can have virtual selves, “surrogates” who walk and talk and act like us, doing the dirty work of living our lives while we stay in the comfort of our home viewing it from the sidelines. Except there is growing dissent and the predictable marginalization of people who cannot afford surrogates and thus is the stage set for virtual, and real racial tension between those who can afford surrogates and those who don’t and oppose their use. A series of murders involving surrogates and their owners occur and into this mystery steps in US Federal Agent Tom Grier (Bruce Willis in a freakishly photoshopped face and body…with blond hair no less…and bangs) and partner, Radha Mitchell as they try to solve these crimes. A series of convoluted plots later, Grier discovers that the founder of the company that produced the surrogates (James Cromwell – in a similar role he did in “I, Robot”) had engineered the murders to bring down the company he helped create so that he can destroy not only the company but also the surrogates and their owners. Needless to say, the real Grier emerges from his self-imposed isolation to solve the mystery, destroy the surrogates and save the day.

Verdict: Hmmm….hard to tell. It was entertaining, yes, but not compelling. There is something about a freakishly photoshopped Bruce Willis that is surreal. I doubt if virtual selves can be taken out of computers and online games and software and into real life. Thus, you would have to dismiss plausibility and delve into the philosophical and metaphysical aspects of the story. You already know what this story wants to say: Don’t live like a zombie, live your life authentically, etc.etc. A lot of other sci-fi (and non-genre) movies have already successfully tackled these issues. Perhaps what this film lacks is the same kind of thing that Mostow’s other movie, Terminator III lacked: spirit, soul, sass.

THE FORBIDDEN KINGDOM

Let me just say, Jackie Chan rocks and Jet Li rules. For as long as I can remember, their movies dominated my childhood, along with the movies of such B-level actors as Chuck Norris, Jean Claude Van Damme, Dolph Lundgren and Sylvester Stallone (macho Philippines, what can I say?). I have never seen them in one movie before, and to see them in one movie now excites like no other. And this movie, does not disappoint. Forget the plot, I watch Jackie Chan and Jet Li movies for the kung fu. :-)

But briefly: in the days of Middle Kingdom some thousands of years ago, the virtuous Monkey King (Jet Li) wins the favor of the Jade Emperor and thus earns the ire of the Jade Warlord who tricks him into giving up his powerful staff and his power during a duel, thereby making the Jade Warlord win the duel, imprison the Monkey King in clay and allow the Jade Warlord to rule over the kingdom ruthlessly.

Enter present-day, unlikely geeky hero —- who stumbles upon the staff while trying to save a Chinese shop owner from a gang of bullies. The staff brings him to the past, to the Middle Kingdom, where he encounters an immortal, played by Jackie Chan, a monk, played by Jet Li and a young musician hell-bent on exacting revenge on the Jade Warlord. As it happens, our unlikely geeky hero turns out to be the Chosen One, the one who will end the Jade Warlord’s reign of tyranny, free the Monkey King and usher in a new era of peace. Thus, the immortal and the monk train aforementioned hero and helps him defeat the Jade Warlord and free the Monkey King.

Suffice it to say, just watching Jackie Chan and Jet Li fight it out in their scenes together with balletic elegance is awesome. :-) They’re like the Robert De Niro and Al Pacino of kung-fu movies.

ADVENTURELAND

Remember those times in your life when everything just persists on being shitty? When you were young and had a kick-ass degree and upon graduation realize that neither your youth nor your degree can save you from a shitty life or from getting shitty jobs that pay shit wages? Well, don’t look now but somebody came up with the bright idea of making a movie out of your life. :-) And mine, as it happens. :-)

Jessie Eisenberg plays fresh comparative litt major whose father gets demoted and thus has to move with the whole family to Pittsburgh to be able to survive on the father’s salary. Jessie’s dreams of graduate school and of a summer spent in Europe are dashed to pieces, and he must now get a dead-end minimum wage job at “Adventureland” as one of the operators of the games. His life would have been infinitely boring and tedious had it not been for Em (the, must-admit, cute Kristen Stewart), the cool, laidback colleague he becomes mildly interested in and who shares a mild attraction to him as well, but who is, in fact, sleeping with the resident technician cum wanna-be rockstar, played by Ryan Reynolds. Things come to a head when Eisenberg finds out that Em has, in fact, been sleeping with the married Ryan Reynolds, but they make up in the end.

Categories: Film reviews · Films · Funemployed geek · popular culture
Tagged: , , , ,

Film watch list: What have I been watching?!?

October 28, 2009 · Leave a Comment

Back from a long hiatus. What have I been watching thus far? Well…

The Proposal – Sandra Bullock is the fire-breathing, man-eating incarnation of Meryl Streep’s Miranda Priestly (The Devil Wears Prada), albeit a watered down, less scarier, version. She is a Canadian book editor who faces deportation if she does not fix her visa status soon. Enter nice book editor’s assistant, the secretly rich, quiet Ryan Reynolds who reluctantly agrees to marry her so she can get a spouse visa. Sparks fly. Dogs fly. Guess how it ends? Sidebar: I am sorry. I could not finish this. I just feel that Sandra Bullock is too old to be in romantic comedies. Why can she not be like other fortysomething Hollywood movie stars and star in a movie where she actually acts her age?!?

I Could Never Be Your Woman -  Michelle Pfeiffer is a successful TV executive producer and a single mom juggling between the responsibilities of work and home. Enter Paul Rudd as the young break out actor who falls for her. Sparks fly. Cute one-liners fly. Movie falls flat. Amy Heckerling directed this. So that makes you scratch your head. I do not know why this one has not done better. Perhaps it is because they were trying to pass Michelle Pfeiffer and Paul Rudd off as younger, trying to make a non-issue as an issue, trying to make a conflict out of nothing, trying to make a movie that just does not quite compute.

Garden State – Zach Braff plays a young struggling New York actor cum waiter who comes home for his mother’s funeral. Estranged from his father, alienated from his hometown, the character does not know what to do and I do not know what to make of this film as well. Natalie Portman is thrown in in the middle of the mix as a chronic liar with epileptic fits, but even her charm does not save this movie. The problem? Nothing happens. Literally nothing happens in the movie, the whole entire time.

The Sweetest Thing – I know this is an old one, but since I had to go through it, I might as well write about it. Cameron Diaz and her lady friends spend their time hanging out and hooking up (unfortunately not with each other). Apparently they all have issues. Cameron Diaz’s character is afraid of relationships, and her other two friends cannot just have enough sex (in fact, Selma Blair’s character’s jaw gets stuck in an uncompromising position while doing it) and…well, that’s it really.

The Heartbreak Kid – Ben Stiller has relationship issues. Encouraged by family and friends (note to self: never listen to family and friends), he proposes to the first woman he meets on the street and she turns out to be a total psycho (creepy that). On their honeymoon, he meets the perfect woman (Michelle Monaghan). Sparks fly. Lies fly. Fights ensue. This one is actually funny.

Made of Honor – Patrick Dempsey has relationship issues. He is bestfriends with Michelle Monaghan and is in love with her but does not realize it until she leaves for Scotland and comes back with a rich Scottish fiance. Sparks fly. Montages fly.  Guess how it ends?!?

The Ugly Truth – This one is actually more fun. Katherine Heigl (look how nicely she’s filled out since those “Roswell” days!) is a successful TV executive producer (aren’t they always?) with relationship issues. She has a crush on the neighborhood hottie but can’t quite work up the courage to ask him out. Enter totally un-PC, totally woman-hating Gerald Butler (without the “300″ get-up…so sad!) who teaches her how to play the dating game without looking like a total dork. Sparks fly. Vibrating panties fly (best scene that, actually. This redeems the movie for me). Happy endings for everyone.

Mary and Max – Eight-year old Mary from Australia, and 40something obese man from New York, Max, strike up a friendship as pen pals. The story chronicles how each one go through life. A touching, bittersweet, heartfelt animated film.

Zombieland – Funny take on zombie movies, with Woody Harrelson starring, with funny cameo from comedian Bill Murray. Mixes tongue-in-cheek humor with indie sensibility. Winning formula! Now a hit in the USA.

Categories: Culture · Film reviews · Films · Funemployed geek · Rants and raves · popular culture · social commentary
Tagged: , , , , , , ,

Movies! in 3 lines or less!

October 3, 2009 · Leave a Comment

This is escapism I know, but one needs something to cope with all the madness and chaos that is the Philippines. So here are the movies I’ve watched in three lines or less:

1. 17 AGAIN:

Mike O’Donnell (Matthew Perry) – or as we like to call him, Chandler: I want to be 17 again.

Mike O’Donnell (Zac Efron) – or as we like to call him, that guy Troy Bolton from High School Musical: I want to be a high school jock again!

Fans: Trying to suspend disbelief – how can somebody who looks like Zac Efron grow up to look like Chandler?!?

2. ANGELS and DEMONS

Camerlengo Patrick McKenna (Ewan McGregor): The pope is dead! Long live the Illuminati!

Robert Langdon (Tom Hanks):  The pope is dead! Long live symbology!

Fans: Screw this! We’re just watching it for Ewan McGregor!

3. NEW MOON

(Ok this hasn’t come out yet, but I’ve read the book, so)

Edward: I can’t be with you. I’ll go to Italy and kill myself.

Jacob: I’m a werewolf and while Edward is away, I’ll make my move on Bella.

Bella: I will remain completely self-absorbed. Like I did in the last movie.

4. LAST HOUSE ON THE LEFT

Family: We will vacation in the woods, somewhere away from civilization where of course, a group of psycho criminals will find us and wreak havoc on our picture perfect family.

Criminals: We will take your daughter, rape, torture and kill her.

Family: You missed. Now we torture and kill you.

5. DARK KNIGHT

Bruce Wayne: I am a rich playboy with a lot of issues who has a penchant for bats and for wearing costumes.Oh, I have the hots for the district attorney’s girlfriend.

Joker: I am a crazy man with a lot of issues with a penchant for bats and waring costumes and lipstick.

District Attorney Harvey Dent: You killed my girlfriend! Now I have a lot of issues as well! Oh, and I’m going to kill you both!

6. THE BOY IN THE STRIPED PYJAMAS

German boy: I am a lonely young boy with no playmates whose father is the commander of the Auschwitz camp.

Jewish boy: I am a lonely young boy with no playmates and I am about to die in the camp.

German boy: Let’s be friends! And I’ll sneak into the camp and die in the gas chamber with you and end the movie.

7. FREEDOM WRITERS

Erin Gruwell (Hilary Swank): I am young, privileged, naive, white teacher with an insecure (but really hot!) husband, intent on making a difference in my poor high school students’ lives.

Students: What the f*ck do you know about being poor?!?

Erin Gruwell: Let me tell you about Anne Frank.

8. CLOVERFIELD

Lily (Jessica Lucas): My boyfriend’s brother has been promoted to VP and is moving to Japan. I will throw a party, have my boyfriend video it, invite my boyfriend’s brother’s bestfriend who had a one-night stand with him and complicate things.

Lily’s boyfriend, Jason: I will ask my friend Hud to video it instead because I can’t be bothered with all this.

Hud the Cameraman: I am in love with one of the guests and will video her instead.

Lily’s boyfriend’s brother, Rob: A disaster just struck and I will drag you all over New York trying to rescue the love of my life.

Monster: I don’t care about your stupid storyline. I’ll eat you all and end the movie.

9. THE SPIRIT

The Spirit: I don’t know what I am, but I like saving people.

The Octopus: I hate The Spirit and I hate people. I’ll just make life a living hell for The Spirit and the people.

Moviegoer: I cannot believe this crappy movie ever got made.

10. ACROSS THE UNIVERSE:

Jude: I am a working class lad from Liverpool in search of my father who I believe works in Yale, save up to go to the US, find out my father is a janitor in Yale, befriend a Yalie drop out, meet his pretty (and really hot!) sister, Lucy, move to New York, get deported and try to win his sister back.

Lucy: I will just be the object of Jude’s affection. Oh, and get involved in anti-Vietnam protests.

Prudence: I am the token closeted Asian-American lesbian in love with the New York landlady with a promising storyline that suddenly quietly disappears.

Director: I’ll throw in some other characters and compress all the issues of the 60s into this one movie, plus add in the coolest Beatles music sung with psychedelic backdrop.

Moviegoer: Awesome! (at least for me it was. Who can resist a Beatles’ musical?!?)

11. MAMMA MIA

Sophie (Amanda Seyfried): I don’t know who my father is! I need to know who it is before my big wedding! I’ll steal my mom’s diary, find out my mom slept with three men, invite them all to the wedding and figure out who my father is.All the tune of Abba songs!

Donna (Meryl Streep): I don’t know who my daughter’s father is. I see all three of them before the big wedding and start singing Abba songs!

Three possible fathers: We don’t know which one of us is Sophie’s father. But who cares?!? We’ll just have a ball singing and dancing (rather excruciatingly) to Abba songs!

Moviegoer (mostly me): Awesome!

12. MADE OF HONOR

Tom Bailey (Patrick Dempsey): I am in love with my bestfriend and of course it will take me the whole movie to realize this.

Hannah (Michelle Monaghan): I am in love with my bestfriend and of course it will take me the whole movie to realize this.

Director: Let’s throw in every other cliche into this movie and hope for the best! Oh, and throw in Patrick Dempsey in a really short, short tartan skirt!

Moviegoer (thinking): Wow…crap…but the leads are hot, so I guess I can forgive him/her!

Categories: Film reviews · Films · Funemployed geek · popular culture
Tagged:

Monday, Monday…

August 17, 2009 · Leave a Comment

What can I say except I am loving catching up on my cable watching? It’s not really good, but since I am currently without any internet connection and the laptop is indisposed, I have to resort to other means of available entertainment. Hence, I have watched:

1. Planet Terror - An all-star cast tries to battle zombies after a bio-chemical weapons project goes awry. Gory, hilarious, weird, but always fun to watch, it’s kind of like “From Dusk til Dawn” – except instead of vampires, you get zombies.  Enjoyed watching it because 1. it had Rose McGowan as the stripper whose leg gets amputated and she first gets a table leg, then a gun strapped to her amputated leg, 2. Marley Shelton as the nurse cheating on husband-doctor Josh Brolin with hottie girlfriend Fergie from the Black-eyed Peas (how cool is that?), points for the look on Shelton’s face when she gets to ride on a bike with a barely-clothed McGowan (yay!), and for her funny, anesthetized hands that Josh Brolin pricks in his anger, and with which she drives with 3. Freddie Rodriguez (of 6 feet under fame) as the token, brooding, bad-ass El Wray, 4. Naveen Andrews (of Lost fame) getting his brains blown off, 5. Quentin Tarantino’s cameo as the psycho soldier whose testicles fall off as he turns into a zombie (funny and eww at the same time), 6.  Fergie, Bruce Willis, Michael Biehn (need I say more?), 7. That amputated leg – it is a major star! :-) It’s cheesy, it’s campy, it’s gross, it’s fun. Don’t expect any profoundness from this movie.

2. Last Chance Harvey - Dustin Hoffman’s Harvey is a down-on-his-luck divorced advertising composer who bails on his estranged daughter’s wedding in London, only to miss his flight because of traffic (bloody m-25!). He meets down-on-her-luck Emma Thompson’s Kate and together they bond, talk, walk the streets of London (god, I miss London!), grow a little, and fall in love. My summary does not do it justice. The plot isn’t Oscar-worthy, but Thompson is divine and Hoffman is still at the top of his game. Plus, it’s refreshing to see love stories about people who are over 50.

More later.

Categories: Films · Funemployed geek · Media · popular culture

Thursday: Discovering “Martyrs” with two more days to go in London…

July 16, 2009 · Leave a Comment

6:00 pm – Watching “Valley of Flowers” and “Martyrs” simultaneously.

Common denominator: Mylene Jampanoi. :-)

http://www.image-service.be/sam/IMG/jpg/Mylene-Jampanoi.jpg

Mylene Jampanoi

Though liked “The Chinese Botanist’s Daughter”, did not really like it enough to keep watching it again, but did like Mylene Jampanoi and Xiao Ran Li.

8:00 pm – “Valley of Flowers” looks like a classic Asian B-movie film,but I will go through it for her. What tipped me off that it might be B-movie? Lead Miland Soman showing his ass (or possibly his butt double) only a few minutes into the film.  “Martyrs” though seems intense. Not “Drag me to Hell” intense. More like “Saw” meets “Blair Witch Project” meets “Hostel” intense. I am bummed that the movie is dubbed in English, so I cannot hear her speak in French. I would happily read subtitles if it means I can hear her speak in French. She makes French sound even hotter.

8:30 pm – I just noticed that at certain angles, Mylene Jampanoi looks French, then at other angles, looks Chinese, then a combination of the two. Her eyes remind me of Milla Jovovich’s. She kind of reminds me of a younger version of Sophie Marceau (and at times, Emanuelle Beart).

8:45 pm- Monumentally crushed that Mylene Jampanoi is married. To a Bollywood actor, no less (that should provide an interesting gene pool for their offspring). Why? Why? Why? :-)

9:00 pm – Cannot seem to finish either movie, though “Martyrs” seem the more compelling of the two. I keep getting distracted. This is a message to you, filmmakers – if your movie sucks, or is only marginally interesting, we, your viewers, can always go online and find something else more entertaining.

I feel like watching “I love you Beth Cooper” now.

9:52 pm – “Martyr” has more blood and gore in it than a weekend “Red Cross” blood donation drive. Mylene dies after 45 minutes. Might go downhill from here. Morjana Alaoui and the character she plays, Anna,  are interesting though. Her character is supremely devoted to Mylene Jampanoi’s tortured, demented character (I don’t know why – I just think girls like them demented or tortured). I mean, hell, she gets rid of the bodies Jampanoi’s character murdered! If that isn’t devotion (with a hint of some subtle sapphic undertones) I don’t know what is.

I wish I could watch more of her movies though. Damn Hollywood imperialism! It forces me to watch such blockbuster drivel as “Transformers 2″ but keeps me from watching better non-Hollywood films.

10:09 pm – Still have not finished “Martyrs”. Gave up on “Valley of Flowers” already. Tried to watch Japanese movie “Machine Girl” but it is crappy as well. I still want to watch “Martyrs” – I just do not know if I want to go where it wants me to go.

http://www.horrorphile.net/images/martyrs-movie-poster12.jpg

Kick-ass movie poster don't you think?

Two more days to go…sigh…

Read a Jessica Zafra review on the film “Adventureland“, which she ends by writing, “True, maybe I love this movie because it reminds me of Say Anything, another movie with a Replacements song. And because I was an unemployed comparative lit major who had long planned to get out of here.“  That stops me on my tracks. What does that mean? She wants to get out of Manila? Of her life? What?

And what about me? I had succeeded in getting out of Baguio – at least for 14 months.  The sinking, depressing realization though is that when you get out, you realize that the other place isn’t what it’s all cracked up to be. And then you spend your time trying to get out of that place that you planned to go to in the first place. I think to get out of anywhere does not mean to get out physically – but just to escape in other ways.

I guess this is why “Martyrs” is so unwatcheable: we are all planning to get out somewhere, of the “here”, but never really quite escaping it. You’re trapped. In your past, by your demons, by your own concepts and constructs.

11:00 pm – Saw the ending of “Martyrs”. Morjana Alaoui’s Anna is caught and tortured repeatedly, and….you have to watch the film to know what happens next.

It is a horrid, harrowing, terrifying film. And it is not even because of the profusion of blood and gore. It is more the suspense, the anticipation. It is a very unusual, surprising film (very French, in that). I do not think I will watch it ever again. Even if it has Mylene Jampanoi in it. It is also an existential film. Yeah, you heard me. Existentialism in a horror film! Who knew?

But one thing this film does succeed at is its promise that it will make “Saw” and “Hostel” seem like “Sesame Street”. In all aspects it is true. I dare you to watch it.

12:45 am – I just found out Mylene Jampanoi or as I like to call her hot French actor crush, or simply The Crush) may have separated from her Bollywood hubby. Hope springs eternal…err…I can dream can’t I?

Martyrs Trailer (it’s actually pretty neat):

Categories: Films · Funemployed geek · popular culture
Tagged: , ,

World Cinema review: The Chinese Botanist’s Daughter (Les filles du Botaniste Chinois) (France, 2006)

July 14, 2009 · Leave a Comment

The story:

http://inlinethumb53.webshots.com/564/2087291970084807748S600x600Q85.jpgMi Li (Mylene Jampanoi) is a young, half-Chinese, half-Russian orphaned woman who grew up isolated and lonely in an orphanage. A chance to learn about herbal medicines from the famed Mr. Chen (Ling Dong Fu) takes her away from this sheltered life, and into a paradise, a beautiful island garden of Eden.  Here she meets strict, temperemental Mr. Chen,who reigns on the island and his daughter with a temper and sense of entitlement to match. This devoted daughter is Chen An (Xiao Ran Li), who (quite literally), waits on him hand and foot,  from clipping his toenails to washing them, to providing him his meals, his groceries and so on. Like Mi Li, she has lived an isolated, lonely, motherless life. The only life she has known is that of living with her father and his plants.

It is thus a matter of time before Li and An are attracted to each other, an attraction that slowly blooms into love and unquestionable devotion and obsession with each other. The relationship they have is threatened by Li’s apprenticeship ending and by the sudden arrival of An’s buff, bicep-flexing soldier, oaf of a brother, Dan (Wei Chang Wang) who, pressured by their father to get married, decides to woo Li. An grows jealous of Dan’s affections for Li, but Li proves her love by rejecting An’s brother. But An convinces her, against her better judgment, to marry Dan, so that they can never be separated. Dan will be sent off to Tibet and since soldiers are not allowed to bring their families along, Li will be able to stay behind and be with An. Li agrees but Dan finds out she is not a virgin, beats her and leaves her behind. She goes back to the island garden, and lives with An just as they intended. Li’s stay in the island creates a delicate imbalance between the father and the daughter, and ultimately shatters the very rigid life they have beneath this paradise, exposing it for what it truly is.

The verdict:

Save for some melodramatic plot points and inconsistencies, and the sometimes distracting dirge-like music that rises in crescendo-like waves every time the two main characters declare undying love for each other, this film is gorgeous.

http://www.artsandopinion.com/2007_v6_n4/volume_images/chinesebotanist-3.jpgThis is in shot in Vietnam, even though it was supposed to be set in China, and Vietnam’s beauty is showcased in its full glory. There are sweeping panoramic shots of beautiful, lush rice fields, mountains, the river and the ever-present gardens. Every shot, every scene, is shot in slow, languid strokes, making you stop and enjoy each scene. The film has a lovely, dream-like, illusory feel towards it, that reels you in and hypnotizes you. You can actually almost feel the mist the rises from the river, the rain that falls on the gardens, the steam that lifts up slowly from An’s body as she kneads pine resin or lies naked on a bed of herbs. This is a very sensual, very French film, and you can see this most of all when An and Li are together – those subtle longing glances, that palpable sexual tension, the fascinating chemistry they have with each other -  ultimately what makes this story compelling. This is even made more so by the fact that while shooting the film, neither actors could actually understand each other, as Jampanoi (who is half-French, half-Chinese) does not speak Chinese, and Xiao Ran Li does not speak French. I love how their love story slowly develops, even with little dialogue (which is usually such a part of western mainstream rom-com cinema,gay or otherwise).

http://www.glasgay.co.uk/media/photogallery/photo21965/hi-res-images-2008/26-37%5B1%5D.jpgI am kind of surprised and not-so surprised that a Chinese-born, France-based man, Sijiie Dai, directed this film. The slow direction and lush cinematography is very Chinese, the melodrama is a bit Chinese soap opera, but more French (and male) in its romanticization of love (especially love between women) as is its off-hand depiction of nudity :-) .  Only a man would be able to shoot a woman, fully-clothed, doing something as mundane as kneading pine resin, as steam rises beneath her, and still manage to make it really sensual and erotic.

Anyway, I digress. I have tried to resist the urge to read other reviews about this film and have found mixed reviews about the film. On the one hand, we are all in agreement that it is beautifully shot and that it is compelling, but we are in disagreement about the story itself. The male critic/viewer did not like this – as they find the male and female characters as stereotypes and the depiction of Chinese culture as stereotypical as well. But that is because they are not armed with feminist analysis at their fingertips. :-)

I watched this and I saw a surprising critique, an indictment of a male-dominated, patriarchal, misogynist society that subjugates  female sexuality and desire and extinguishes any form of female assertion before it gets out of hand – all of it subtly wrapped in metaphor and myth.

http://www.artsandopinion.com/2007_v6_n4/volume_images/chinesebotanist-4.jpgFor truly what this film is is a brilliant re-imagining of the Garden of Eden story. The father and the daughter live in a paradise where the father lives out his fantasy of being king, living with a young woman who waits on him hand and foot. Li’s entrance into their paradise and into their lives, the exotic outsider beauty (who may also be a symbol of Western influence or threat to Eastern culture, which seems to raise the un-PC question-is homosexuality an external, Western influence?), upsets the balance of this paradise. Li and An’s discovery of their sexuality, their acknowledgment of that discovery and of their love for each other, also help them assert themselves to An’s tyrannical father. This is shown deliberately in the film: where before An buys groceries for her father and cares for his plants, she starts to forget and the father finds himself doing the grocery buying himself. There comes a time when he starts having meals by himself, abandoning his place at the head of the table, his symbol of power, and the couple clearly has won a battle. Li is thus now considered the evil descended on the garden, which might be akin to awakened female sexuality being considered evil as well. Li and An must now decide to leave the garden and in time, when the father finds out, they do. When Li and An are found out, and they are shot for their homosexuality, this is actually akin to society’s response to female sexuality in general: it cannot handle it, so it must shoot it down, re-subjugate it, for society’s sake. Love, especially homosexual love, is subversive, and must be stopped. However, Li and An’s complicity in the father’s death, seems to imply the way forward in female sexuality (a fine line between assertion and aggression).

And thus, viewed in this context, you will find that this film is surprisingly feminist, albeit a bit misinformed about female sexuality. You will also come to realize as well, why this was banned in China and why the Chinese government refused to allow the director to shoot it in China.

At the same time, it raises a lot of other questions as well: since the garden is depicted as mythical, almost illusory, since the women deal with herbs that are sometimes hallucinogenic, does that mean sexuality is illusory as well? But then, if that is the case, then it also raises the issue of cultural and social constructs as illusory as well. Ah, the gorgeous metaphorical possibilities!

Now, on to the inconsistencies: Critics and viewers have balked at how stereotypical the characters are, at how melodramatic it is (it is a bit) and I wonder about the part where they executed: does this really happen? It feels like a cop-out somehow – like the director wanted to maximize the fullest possible melodramatic, emotional impact of the film. In other words,it feels like he sold out for a western audience. I have seen Hu Die (Butterfly), Candy Rain and Spider Lilies, and though the endings may or may not be desirable, you will always notice how strong and positive the depiction of Chinese women are. And nowhere is the execution of women for homosexuality so implausible as in China. If it were in India, where homosexuality, until recently, was criminalized, or in the Middle East, maybe, but China? They are probably as intolerant as the next society, but I have never heard homosexuals being shot for being gay in China. I could be wrong, of course and generalizations cannot account for individual knee-jerk emotional reactions.

Overall, though, this is a gorgeous, gorgeous film, a beautiful, quiet meditation on love, devotion and sacrifices,  and I recommend it – if only because, sans ending, it rises above the drama and turn love into something almost…lyrical.

Trivia:

  • Although Mylene Jampanoi is half-French and half-Chinese, she actually only speaks French and English. She had to learn her lines phonetically. This means she and co-star Li Xiao Ran could not, during the duration of filming, understand each other and Jampanoi needed a translator to communicate with the rest of the cast.
  • Jampanoi lived with her co-star Li Xiao Ran for the three months that they were shooting in Vietnam, to establish that intimacy and chemistry so prevalent in the film.
  • Jampanoi does not wear contacts in this movie: those are her real eyes. :-)
  • I suspect Jampanoi might be the next French import to Hollywood. But that’s just me.
  • It is believed that this film was based on two Chinese women in the 1980s who fell in love and had been discovered by the father of one of the women. They were accused of murdering the father and were sentenced to death for the murder (something that was omitted in the film, and which would have made more sense).
  • This movie is actually Sijie Dai’s indictment of the Chinese communist regime – regimented, disciplined, isolated, stern, rigid, and so on (quite different from my own analysis, it would seem).

Categories: Film reviews · Films · Homo/Queerness · LGBT films · popular culture
Tagged: , , , , ,

Retro-mad film review: Milk (US, 2008)

July 13, 2009 · Leave a Comment

Usually I have low expectations about popular or famous or well-publicized films. I especially am wary of films that get good reviews from the gay media. I know they play for my team – but more often than not, they give good reviews to some movies that can really be bad sometimes.

So, I watched this film with some reservations and apprehensions – only to be blown away by how beautiful this film is.

“Milk” tells the story of the first gay district supervisor Harvey Milk, played with fearless verve and aplomb by Sean Penn. Directed by Gus Van Sant, the story chronicles the life and times of Harvey Milk – from when he hits 40 and realizes that he has not done anything he is proud of, to realizing that he could change this by running for supervisor, ultimately galvanizing a fragmented gay group into one organized movement that not only helped repeal Proposition 8 – a proposition that would ban gay and lesbian teachers from teaching but passed the first gay-friendly laws in the United States.

I loved this film. It has a documentary feel about it, it feels raw and authentic, very real. It catches the feel of the 70s, from the clothes, to the hair (the hair! always the hair!), the cars, the shops, the streets, right down to the grainy, all-too bright lighting of 70s filmmaking. It calls to mind all the 70s TV shows and movies I used to watch when I was a kid.I loved the editing and how fast-paced the movie is. It drops you right in the middle of the action and does not stop until it gets to Milk’s death.  There are also no dull moments – all the frames are filled with substance, and stylish documentary style filmmaking. The script of the story is tight and inclusive, remembering to include other issues happening during that time as well and managing to make the film relevant, even though this film was set in the 70s.

I loved how it did not paint Milk as neither hero nor saint, but an ordinary person with a strong motivation, a business and media-savvy sense, brilliant and flawed at the same time, and all together human at the same time, and Sean Penn plays him so well. I liked the supporting cast, from James Franco’s Scott (that guy should start winning awards now – he’s officially pushed the envelope on the number of risque roles he’s played), to Alison Pill’s lesbian campaign manager,to Diego Luna as Milk’s lover. Kudos goes to Josh Brolin as the conflicted, tormented Dan White, who manages to convey just the right amount of inner conflict and empathy for a character that would, in the hands of a lesser actor, would just come out as evil.

Milk is one of those films that leave you emotionally drained after seeing the ending – but it is also one of those films that will renew your spirit, inspire you and hopefully make you want to make the world a better place. Watch it. You won’t regret it.

Off to watch “The Chinese Botanist’s Daughter” now.

Categories: Film reviews · Films · Homo/Queerness · LGBT films · Rants and raves · popular culture · social commentary
Tagged: , , , ,

Retro-mad film review: Looking for Comedy in the Muslim World (US, 2006)

July 7, 2009 · Leave a Comment

http://img2.ifilmpro.com/resize/image/stills/films/resize/istd/2689055.jpg

Sheetal Sheth: The apotheosis of Hotness :-)

I have a confession to make: I watched this film only because it had Sheetal Sheth in it. And the reason I watched it was because I was wilfing on the ‘net and I saw her interviews and I was struck with how articulate and passionate she was about things (which was in contrast to Lisa Ray’s mild, laidback, neutral interviews). She is actually much more fun in interviews than Lisa Ray (although Lisa Ray uses words like “existential” correctly, and any actor who can use that word in a sentence is hot to me!). If you want to check out Sheetal Sheth’s interviews, click here, here and here. By the way, I have discovered that Shamim Sarif has a blog which is hilarious and entertaining, so I guess I can forgive her for her films, haha! Click here for her blog.

Anyway, imagine my surprise when I watch this film and realize how funny it is! And how very underrated it is.

But I think it is because this subject matter of this film is very controversial and people and critics do not really know what to make of it. Is it making fun of Muslims? Is it poking fun at something else? Is it some kind of propaganda? Well, the best way to approach this film is to watch it first and to assume that it is a political satire – which it effectively is.

Albert Brooks plays a much more exaggerated, egoistic, spoiled bratty version of himself who cannot find jobs and is thus recruited by the government to do a research on what makes Muslims laugh, the end result of which is a 500-page report and a medal from the government. Preposterous, yes, but that is the whole point of the film – how some ideas sound brilliant on paper, but just sound preposterous when you start implementing it. Thus he goes to India fully expecting an entourage, a welcome party, everyone pandering to his every want and need but finds that nobody knows him and nobody cares. After being safely ensconced in his hotel, having two American agents with him, and a young, earnest Indian woman as his secretary (Sheetal Sheth) he sets out to find out what makes Muslims laugh, interviewing Indians on the streets, in clubs, in mosques, even stages a hilarious stand-up comedy show and finding out that he has no clue whatsoever about how to find out what makes Muslims laugh, much less how to connect with them. Finally, he goes to Pakistan illegally and finds an audience in a group of fledging stand-up comedians who does find his routine funny and he starts to get it, except he inadvertently starts World War III when India and Pakistan get wind of his research and mistake it for another meddlesome tactic from the American government designed to disturb the already fragile peace between the two countries.

http://www.popentertainment.com/muslimworld17.jpg

Sheetal Sheth & Albert Brooks looking for comedy in India

I liked this film. It is smart, understated, subtle and what shines through is the filmmaker’s recognition of the audience as intelligent beings capable of gleaning meaning from a seemingly innocuous film about comedy and Islam and then ending up as a hilarious satire and analogy of America’s seemingly well-intentioned but ultimately ridiculous, pretentious idea that it can call itself the world’s protector of Western democracy and freedom.  The fact that the analogy is so specific – Pakistan and India, for example (replace that with Iran and Iraq, or Iraq and Kuwait or Iraq and Afghanistan, or Palestine and Israel), or the looking for comedy in a Muslim world in a spiritually diverse India (replace that with looking for weapons of mass destruction in the wrong places) and this film makes even more sense! In both situations, the protagonist (Brooks/America) look for something which does not exist,since they are looking for it in their own socio-cultural and politically incorrect context.  Hence Brooks could not find the comedy, because he looks at it from a his perspective, not fully realizing that of course, comedy comes in different forms, and different people from different cultures find different things funny. Hence a joke about Gandhi and halloween in the same sentence to a largely Indian audience for whom Ghandi is much revered will not be a hit, but the same joke would be a hit in Pakistan, for example. Brooks’ realization that he is not the almighty god of comedy or the big celebrity that he is, is a humbling experience for him, and it reflects the kind of experience America probably has when, almost a decade after 9/11, there are still no weapons of mass destruction, nor Osama Bin Laden, anywhere near the countries from which they claimed both were. This is, by the way, effectively conveyed in the film with scenes of Pakistani and Indian diplomats and politicians drawing their own hasty conclusions from inadequate intel. Dodgy intelligence, suspicious distrustful leaders, recipe for disaster – oh,wait, that’s why we  had the Iraq war!

Some of the funniest scenes from this consist of Brooks just having quick verbal exchanges with the people around him. The random interviews with people on the streets, in clubs, in mosques and the hilarious exchanges between him and earnest, eager, secretary Maya (Sheetal Sheth) as he teaches her the virtues of sarcasm are comedy gem. Another funny scene is the one where he stages a comedy show in an auditorium. The conversation with the auditorium keepers (when he asks them to kill the house lights, and since the switches are not working – the person in charge kills the power for the whole auditorium, effectively engulfing them in darkness) is fun as well as the other bits in that scene. Since he is a proper diva, he demands a dressing room, and he instead gets a teepee outside the auditorium, he introduces himself as himself as one of the greatest comedians in the world, and of course, hubris being what it is, proceeds to have his ego dashed onstage when nobody laughs at him. In desperation, he turns to improv, which was an even worse idea, because nobody still gets it, which effectively tells us – he has no idea what he is doing. The improv, by the way, ends up being a bit of  a funny treatise on political correctness.

Brooks’ character is properly belligerent and clueless and this works for the film, and makes it even more hilarious. Sheetal Sheth as the secretary is a great addition to the cast, and watching her match Brooks’ performance is a joy and a revelation: she is actually a good actor, in fact an even better one than “The World Unseen” and “I Can’t Think Straight” will lead me to believe. I like her more now – she seems to have more range (yay!). She also speaks in a passable Indian accent which  made me miss my Indian co-workers and classmates more (one thing I will miss about London – the Indians and Africans I made friends with). In interviews, she actually sounds very New York-ish and comes off as more confident and enthusiastic as well. I officially have  a crush on her now. Elaine Cassidy is so last month! :-)

Anyway, I am encouraging everyone to watch this little gem, if you like comedies that are subtle and more intellectual. Plus it did not make money the first time it came out (a budget of $10M, which is not bad, considering how much money was needed to make crap like “Transformers 2″. “Looking for Comedy” made about half a million only on its opening weekend. For shame!), so I would like to promote it. :-)

The trailer (the trailer alone should make you watch it. On the strength of the trailer alone I watched it):

http://img2.ifilmpro.com/resize/image/stills/films/resize/istd/2689055.jpg

Categories: Film reviews · Films · popular culture · social commentary
Tagged: ,

Retro-mad DVD animation review/s: “Highlander: The Search for Vengeance”, “Justice League, A New Frontier”, & “Superman: Doomsday”

July 3, 2009 · 1 Comment

Let me start with the bad one first:

“Highlander: The Search for Vengeance” (2007)  lives up to the cheese and camp that made the Christopher Lambert movies a bit unbearable to watch, including the preposterous premise of a two-thousand year old immortal bent on exacting revenge on another, more powerful immortal who killed his wife two-thousand years ago in the highlands of Scotland. Each time the hero, Colin, meets his enemy, Marcus, he gets defeated – and this is where it gets tedious and excruciating. I myself prefer the Adrian Paul version, but hey, if you’re into this kind of thing, I won’t stop you. Just think of it as “Heavy Metal 2000″ meets “Braveheart” with the anime’d hero channeling “Jackass” and you’ll be fine.

Justice League: A New Frontier” (2007)  is better than the aforementioned “Highlander”, afterall, it has Wonderwoman, Superman, Batman, The Flash and The Green Lantern in 1950s McCarthy era battling an evil called “The Center”, pre-Justice League. A bit underwhelming though, as the TV series was much more interesting to watch than this one (then again, you have a whole season to explore the characters, as compared to the 80 minutes or so devoted to this one, so I should not complain), and I kind of miss Hawkgirl. Anyway, it’s still entertaining.

Superman: Doomsday” (2007) adapts to the animated screen the graphic novel on which this story is based: when Superman dies. Superman battles an evil alien, Doomsday, succeeds in destroying it, but dies fighting him.  Lex Luthor steals his body and DNA from his blood sample to create a clone of Superman, and later, an army of Supermen. Lois Lane realizes her boyfriend is not the real Superman (remember Jurassic Park? Same principle: cloned beings always go awry), whilst the real one comes back from the dead and defeats the clone. This is more entertaining than the Justice League movie, but not as fun as the Wonderwoman movie. ^^

Categories: Film reviews · Films · popular culture
Tagged: , , , ,

Retro-mad DVD review: Batman, Gotham Knight (2008)

July 3, 2009 · Leave a Comment

http://larryfire.files.wordpress.com/2008/06/batman_gothamknight_1dvd1.jpg?w=240&h=360

Warner Home Video/DC Comics

DC Comic’s Batman: Gotham Knight is to Chris Nolan’s Batman film adaptations (Batman: The Beginning and Batman: Dark Knight)  what Animatrix was for the Matrix trilogy,an animated companion that supplements and complements the existing superhero mythos whilst providing a backstory for what transpires in the films themselves.

That being said, this direct-to-DVD compilation of short Batman stories is a welcome addition to the popular franchise, but with a difference.

For a collection of animated shorts, for one, this is no Rated-G or PG-13 Cartoon Network special. It does not shy away from the violence, or the profusion of blood that comes from it. The Batman we see here is shown in various states of vulnerability: hurt, exhausted, bleeding, unlike the Batman we know from Cartoon Network. It provides insights to the famed Caped Crusader and humanizes the often inscrutable, almost invincible superhero.

The DVD collection is made up of six stories, cleverly arranged like an album, with a nice, light beginning, mild stories in the middle and the best bits towards the end.

The stories:

1. “Have I Got a Story for You” – The collection begins with this one, about a group of skateboarding youngsters bragging about seeing Batman and vying for which story is the more outrageous and cooler. The first boy depicts a Batman who not only moves like  a shadow, but is a shadow appearing and disappearing out of thin air. The second one depicts Batman as a real, man-sized bat terrorizing the city, while the last one depicts Batman as a robot, a kind of robo-cop with nifty gadgets who defeats foes readily. Finally, the real Batman bursts into the abandoned area in which the kids have been congregating, and the scene reveals the Batman not only to be human, but also one capable of being hurt as well. Overall a good beginning and delves into perceptions about who and what Batman is, not only from the characters’ perspectives, but from fan perspectives as well.

2. “Crossfire” – Is a so-so story about a cop who thinks Batman is just a vigilante undermining police authority and creibility. His beliefs are put into question when he and his partner get caught in a gang-crossfire and it is Batman who comes to the rescue. As I said, so-so, but one thing it does raise is the issue of vigilantism. Can a person still be considered good, even if he uses no guns or tries to save his victims, even if what he does is against the law?

3. “Field Test” – Another so-so story, about a young Bruce Wayne who tries out a nifty gadget that can deflect bullets at close range, except that the gadget proves unreliable in the most mundane circumstances (say a golf club suddenly flying off during a game) and in crucial moments (the bullet bouncing off his body and hitting somebody else instead), so he decides against using it. We already know that Bruce Wayne/Batman, despite his complex character, has a conscience so this is nothing new, however, the story of the assasinated lady who was against the development of the slum neighborhood into a golf playground, and the villain’s subsequent attempts to make it all better by staging a ridiculous golf tournament for the poor, resonates with the times.

4. “In Darkness Dwells” – Batman rescues a kidnapped bishop from the hands of drug-addled underground junkies. Overall, an underwhelming story.

5. “Working Through the Pain” – This is my favorite and by far the best story in this DVD collection. Bruce is shot while on a routine mission under the sewers of Gotham.  He cauterizes the wound, and as he deals with the agonizing pain, loss of blood and threat of losing consciousness, it is interspersed with flashbacks of his earlier life, such as his days volunteering for a hospital ward for the wounded and a trip to India.  Bruce Wayne has gone to India to seek enlightenment from the famed Fakirs, but he is refused and his guide leads him to Cassandra, a young mystic who gained her knowledge from the Fakirs masquerading as a boy. Bruce tells her he has come to learn to deal with the pain and Cassandra teaches him, only to realize, later on, that Bruce’s pain maybe beyond her or Bruce’s reach.

I like the conversations between Cassandra and Bruce.  Cassandra tells Bruce, “Pain exists in two forms, that which is exterior, that goes by forces we can’t control, and interior which we can”, and that “both…can be managed through will”.  Bruce insists he knows all of this through research,   showing us Bruce Wayne’s problem: the guy is too cerebral for his own good. This is a fact even Cassandra shoots down, asking him if he has done research on the spiritual aspect of pain as well. Cassandra teaches him that “pain cannot be overcome…but it can be put in its place…pain does not work for you, you work through pain”.

A chance encounter with boys bullying Cassandra reveals that Bruce has not learned anything spiritual from Cassandra, only the ones that Bruce needs for his work.

In the present, as he makes his way through the tunnel, he gets deeper and deeper into it, failing to find any way out, until he lands in an underground dumpster and in it finds loads of guns chucked out.

As he finds more and more of the guns, the viewer realizes that this is exactly what Cassandra has warned him about: since he has failed in dealing with the pain, he has dug a hole deeper than he has ever imagined, one that he cannot find a way out.

For even as he tries to patch up his wound and find mystic answers to his pain, these solutions are temporary and only reveal the futility of his actions: for even if he patches up his wounds, he will still find more guns which can kill.

I liked this story because it is the most human portrait of Batman to date. It is also the most philosophical (well, at least to my knowledge, although I am sure the comic book series is a whole new thing altogether) , and hence cerebral one and I like my Batman cerebral. This is storytelling at its best, with an organic unity and coherence that is refreshing and sadly lacking in live action films (Are you listening Michael Bay?).

Overall, this story establishes and reinforces why Batman, amongst the other DC superheroes,  is so popular in the first place – it is because of those dark stories that deal with the demons that Batman is always struggling to keep at bay and never really succeeding in subduing.

6. “Deadshot” – Batman foils a plot to assasinate the Police Commissioner, Gordon.

Overall, a good DVD collection of shorts although as I said, some of the stories are a bit underwhelming, with the exception of the first one and “Working Through the Pain”.  That being said, the animation is superb – it is, afterall, a joint venture between Japanese directors and animators and American creators.

Categories: Films · Rants and raves · TV shows · popular culture
Tagged: , , , ,